10 most hated football teams
in [World Football]
|
From: MH on 26 Feb 2010 12:29 Enzo wrote: > According to this article- > http://goal.com/en-india/news/2292/editorials/2010/02/23/1803725/10-most-hated-football-teams > > Argentina 90 > Bayern 70s I didn't realize they were hated that much (other than by Bayern's rivals in Germany) > Estudiantes 67-70 > Don Revie's Leeds United > Greece 2004 > Juventus Always > Man U post - 93 > Italy Always > Arsenal 86 - 95 > Ramon Calderon's RM > What about Chelsea post 2003 ? There is lots to dislike. > Here is my list of the 10 most liked - > > Hungary 54/ The magic magyars > Barcelona post - 07 > Busby Babes Man U > Brasil 82 > Holland /Ajax early 70's > Santos of Pel� > Denmark 86 - 92 > Napoli of Maradona > France 82/86 ( Platini ) > AC Milan early 90's I think some other sentimental favourites (though perhaps not for everybody) would be: Borussia M�nchengladbach of the 70s Cameroon 1990 N. Ireland 1982 Belgium 1986 N. Korea 1966 Ipswich late 70s early 80s
From: Benny on 26 Feb 2010 13:09 > Subject : 10 most hated football teams > From : hsv83(a)der-ball-ist-rund.net >>> I agree regarding the money, Milan of 80s and 90s was no different to >>> Chelski today. >> Except that the Milan of the late 80's and early 90's played >> brilliant, ground breaking, epoch making football and Chelski are just >> one of many similar bores going around. > > > Let me correct this: > Except that the Milan of the 80's and early 90's used the money that > they didn't have in the first place better than Chelski. > > ;) > > Ciao, Myth. Milan did not buy their way to titles in the 1980s and 1990s. Gullit was a World record transfer, for �6 million, back in 1987. Milan paid Ajax �1.5 million for Van Basten, they paid even less to sign Rijkaard from Sporting. The back four were already there. Donadoni and Ancelotti may have been low seven figure signings. Sacchi's built a relatively inexpensive side. Under Capello Milan started stockpiling talent but even then Papin aside they did so paying largely modest fees. Far from being a Chelski Milan are an example for every major club. Gullit, Van Basten, Rijkaard, Desailly, Savicevic, Boban, Gattuso, Kaka' all under �10 million. Shevchenko �15 million, Thiago Silva �10 million, Pato �15 million. Sure there have been some expensive flops (Oliveira, Gilardino) but overall not even Wenger can boast a better record in the transfer market. Milan's scouting is second to none. -- http://soccer-europe.com Rss feed : http://soccer-europe.com/RSS/News.xml
From: Benny on 26 Feb 2010 13:48 > Subject : 10 most hated football teams > From : MH <nospam(a)ucalgary.ca> > What about Chelsea post 2003 ? There is lots to dislike. Unless you support Arsenal, Liverpool or Manchester United why on Earth would ANYONE who follows the EPL have a problem with Chelsea? -- http://soccer-europe.com Rss feed : http://soccer-europe.com/RSS/News.xml
From: Alkamista on 26 Feb 2010 14:11 On Feb 26, 12:09 pm, Benny <Be...(a)soccer-europe.com> wrote: > > Subject : 10 most hated football teams > > From : hs...(a)der-ball-ist-rund.net > > >>> I agree regarding the money, Milan of 80s and 90s was no different to > >>> Chelski today. > >> Except that the Milan of the late 80's and early 90's played > >> brilliant, ground breaking, epoch making football and Chelski are just > >> one of many similar bores going around. > > > > > > Let me correct this: > > Except that the Milan of the 80's and early 90's used the money that > > they didn't have in the first place better than Chelski. > > > > ;) > > > > Ciao, > > Myth. Milan did not buy their way to titles in the 1980s and 1990s. > Gullit was a World record transfer, for £6 million, back in 1987. Milan > paid Ajax £1.5 million for Van Basten, they paid even less to sign > Rijkaard from Sporting. The back four were already there. Donadoni and > Ancelotti may have been low seven figure signings. Sacchi's built a > relatively inexpensive side. Under Capello Milan started stockpiling > talent but even then Papin aside they did so paying largely modest fees. > > Far from being a Chelski Milan are an example for every major club. > Gullit, Van Basten, Rijkaard, Desailly, Savicevic, Boban, Gattuso, Kaka' > all under 10 million. Shevchenko 15 million, Thiago Silva 10 million, > Pato 15 million. Sure there have been some expensive flops (Oliveira, > Gilardino) but overall not even Wenger can boast a better record in the > transfer market. Milan's scouting is second to none. I dont know much about Milan from that era but a quick peak at the history of transfer records shows that they broke the world transfer record three times from '87 to 92', including twice in '92 itself! Gullit 6m 1987 Papin 10m 1992 Lentini 13m 1992 Even Chelsea cant hold a candle to that, it smells more like Real Madrid of the '00s. And please dont insult Wenger by comparing Milan's spending habits to his, he is unparalleled when it come to bargain hunting and developing players.
From: Google Beta User on 26 Feb 2010 14:32
On Feb 26, 1:48 pm, Benny <Be...(a)soccer-europe.com> wrote: > > What about Chelsea post 2003 ? There is lots to dislike. > > Unless you support Arsenal, Liverpool or Manchester United why on Earth > would ANYONE who follows the EPL have a problem with Chelsea? Buying success and no history are the criticisms Ive seen. Funny thing is most fans of the EPL wish their clubd be bought by some rich investors for an injection of cash. On LFC boards, fans gasp with excitement everytime one of those rich barosn from the Middle East are rumored to be on the verge of buying out Hicks & Gillet. Also funny thing is for a long time the Mancs spent money that no one else in England could match. |