10 most hated football teams
in [World Football]
|
From: REDDEVIL6 on 2 Mar 2010 14:51 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:47:47 -0800 (PST), FF <FAIRFOOTBALL.COM(a)domainsbyproxy.com> wrote: >REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> I don't know about anyone else but personally I don't "hate" any other >> team > >Not even Italy ??? ;-) > >PS. I really can't understand these folks who talk about debts as if >they were stolen money. People, in case you haven't noticed, the >middle ages are over for quite some time. I love the beautiful game and enjoy seeing all teams play. As far as the debts, few people commenting on them in this news group actually understand where they come from.
From: Sven Mischkies on 2 Mar 2010 15:06 anders t <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote: > Quoting Sven Mischkies in rec.sport.soccer: > >anders t <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Quoting Sven Mischkies in rec.sport.soccer: > >> >anders t <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I have no link, but there was official (I think) figures for how > >> >> much every player in every team ran in meters in each game. That was > >> >> the main reason I immediately and always maintained Greece were > >> >> juiced up. There is simply no way top trained athletes can suddenly > >> >> differ that much without aid from doping. > >> > > >> > > >> >It is normal to run 10-12km in a game, I don't believe that the greeks > >> >ran 15-18km. > >> > >> But that's exactly what happened. Some Greeks posted ~15k. > > > > > >Ah, some. ;) > > Yes, this is a quote of what I said before: > > "But it was established back then that the Greeks ran up to > 50% more during the games than the opponents." > > Key words are: "up to". "The probability that they were doped to the gills kind of shoots down their underdog aura for me." Ciao, SM -- http://www.gourockviews.co.uk I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously. Douglas Adams
From: Sven Mischkies on 2 Mar 2010 15:06 FF <FAIRFOOTBALL.COM(a)domainsbyproxy.com> wrote: > PS. I really can't understand these folks who talk about debts as if > they were stolen money. People, in case you haven't noticed, the > middle ages are over for quite some time. My take on this: It depends if you can pay them back or not. If you can - no problem. If you can't then you cheated your competitors out of signing better payers and better achievements, and therefore deserve to go down, like Pompey, Leeds, Fiorentina, ... ManU and LFC are different cases, as their debt is not the result of overspending, but the result of abuse by their respective owners. Receiving money from a football unrelated source like Chelski, Milan, VW, Bayer, Hopp is something else - it is unfair towards your competitors because this money is not something you earned or deserved and destroys the natural competition between clubs. Ciao, SM -- http://www.gourockviews.co.uk I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously. Douglas Adams
From: REDDEVIL6 on 2 Mar 2010 15:19 On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:06:50 +0000, hsv83(a)der-ball-ist-rund.net (Sven Mischkies) wrote: >FF <FAIRFOOTBALL.COM(a)domainsbyproxy.com> wrote: > >> PS. I really can't understand these folks who talk about debts as if >> they were stolen money. People, in case you haven't noticed, the >> middle ages are over for quite some time. > > >My take on this: >It depends if you can pay them back or not. If you can - no problem. If >you can't then you cheated your competitors out of signing better payers >and better achievements, and therefore deserve to go down, like Pompey, >Leeds, Fiorentina, ... ManU and LFC are different cases, as their debt >is not the result of overspending, but the result of abuse by their >respective owners. > Finally someone that understands!
From: Benny on 2 Mar 2010 15:38
> From : 10 most hated football teams > From : hsv83(a)der-ball-ist-rund.net > I think Juve has always been more cautious with money than both Milano > clubs, but of course I could be a victim of the Bianconeri Propaganda > Machine. 2007-2008. Milan �19.60 million 2007-2008. Juventus �60.30 million 2008-2009. Milan �50 million 2008-2009. Juventus �26.90 million 2009-2010. Milan �17.20 million 2009-2010. Juventus �47.00 million Milan : �86.80 million Juventus : �134.20 million -- http://soccer-europe.com Rss feed : http://soccer-europe.com/RSS/News.xml |